Frank Jamerson
The word hermeneutics has been generally reserved for college classrooms, but in recent years has become popular with many brethren. It means "the
art or science of the interpretation of literature" (Webster). The Greek word "hermeneuo" is defined as, "(cp. Hermes, the name of the pagan god
Mercury, who was regarded as the messenger of the gods), denotes to explain, interpret (Eng., hermeneutics)" (W.E. Vine). A strengthened form of it
is found in Luke 24:27. Jesus "expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself." It simply refers to the principles by which we
interpret, explain or expound the Scriptures.
Those who are calling for a new hermeneutic are saying they do not believe the methods of interpretation we have used are correct. The appeal to
precept, example and necessary inference should be discarded and we should look for another way of understanding Biblical authority. Some say we
should "study the life of Jesus and do what we feel He would do in the situation." It seems strange that people who profess to follow Jesus would
suggest a standard that He neither suggested nor exemplified. If we are to follow the example of Jesus, surely that would include following His example
in how to establish God's Biblical authority.
In every temptation of Jesus, He appealed to the word of God. When the devil said, "If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become
bread," Jesus responded, "It is written Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God" (Mt. 4:3,4). When
the tempter quoted Scripture (Ps. 91:11,12), Jesus countered by saying, "It is written again, You shall not tempt the Lord your God" (Mt. 4:7). To the
third temptation, Jesus said, "Away with you Satan! For it is written, You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve" (Mt. 4:10). If
I understand the example of Jesus, He taught us to act only by the authority of God, to accept everything He said, not just a text out of context. That
does not sound like some subjective feeling of what God might want us to do in a certain situation.
Jesus used precepts (commands or statements of fact) when He was asked about the Father's will. A lawyer wanted to know what to do to inherit
eternal life, and Jesus said "What is written in the law? What is your reading of it?" (Lk. 10:26). The lawyer quoted God's words as revealed through
Moses, and Jesus said, "You have answered rightly, do this and you will live" (Lk. 10:28). When the Pharisees asked Him about divorce, he quoted
Genesis 2:24 and concluded, "Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate" (Mt. 19:6). The Pharisees objected to His application of
that passage and tried to circumvent it by appealing to what Moses permitted, but Jesus insisted that the statement of Genesis 2:24 revealed God's
intention for men.
Jesus also appealed to examples in the Old Testament and taught His disciples to follow them. Certain scribes and Pharisees asked Jesus to show them
other signs, but He said, "An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign, and no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For
as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
The men of Nineveh will rise in the judgment with this generation and condemn it, because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and indeed a
greater than Jonah is here. The queen of the South will rise up in the judgment with this generation and condemn it, for she came from the ends of the
earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and indeed a greater than Solomon is here" (Mt. 12:39-42). Jesus used three examples (Jonah, Nineveh, and the
Queen of Sheba) to teach them that they needed to listen to His teaching!
After demonstrating humility, in the washing of His disciples' feet, Jesus said, "If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought
to wash one another's feet" (Jn. 13:14). Not only did He give them an example, he commanded them to follow it! Those who say we do not learn from
examples are not following the example of Jesus. In fact, even the commands in Scripture come to us through examples.
Jesus also established authority through necessary inference. The Sadducees thought they had Jesus in a dilemma because of the woman who had been
married to seven brothers, but Jesus said, "You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither
marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven. But concerning the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken
to you by God, saying, I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living" (Mt.
22:29-32). The example of God speaking to Moses from the burning bush ( Ex. 3:6), necessarily implied that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob continued to
exist, therefore the Sadducees were wrong about their doctrine. Again, at the end of the chapter, Jesus drew a necessary inference from David's
statement, "The Lord said to my Lord, Sit on My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool" (Mt. 22:44; Ps. 110:1). He concluded, "If
David then calls Him Lord, how is He his Son?" (Mt. 22:45). They had no answer, because they could not deny the necessary implication in the
Scripture.
Yes, we should follow the example of Jesus, but that should include His example of respect for precept, example and necessary inference. Jesus never
told anyone to study the life of Moses and do what he felt Moses would do under your circumstance. He quoted precepts and examples from God's
word and drew necessary conclusions. Those who say we should study the life of Jesus and do what we feel He would do, are not following Jesus.